File
The comparative distinctiveness of equity
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
---|---|
Collection(s) | |
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
Genre |
Genre
|
Peer Review Status |
Peer Review Status
Peer Reviewed
|
Origin Information |
|
---|
Persons |
Author (aut): Leeming, Mark
|
---|
Abstract |
Abstract
Comparative law is difficult and controversial. One reason for the difficulty is the complexity of legal systems and the need for more than a merely superficial knowledge of the foreign legal system in order to profit from recourse to it. One way in which it is controversial is that it has been suggested that the use of comparative law conceals the reasons for decisions reached on other grounds. This paper maintains that equity is distinctive, and that one of the ways in which equity is different from other bodies of law is that there is greater scope for the development of equitable principle by reference to foreign jurisdictions. That difference is a product of equity’s distinctive history, underlying themes and approach to law-making. Those matters are illustrated by a series of recent examples drawn from appellate courts throughout the Commonwealth. |
---|
Publication Title |
Publication Title
|
---|---|
Publication Number |
Publication Number
Volume 2, Issue 2
|
Publication Identifier |
Publication Identifier
issn: 2368-4046 (Online) 2368-4038 (Print)
|
Publication Genre |
Publication Genre
|
Related Item |
Related Item
|
---|
Handle |
Handle
Handle placeholder
|
---|---|
ISSN |
ISSN
2368-4046 (Online) 2368-4038 (Print)
|
Use and Reproduction |
Use and Reproduction
author
|
---|
Subject Topic |
Subject Topic
|
---|